Financial policy in times of crises until 19th century of the Bohemian Duchy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Financial policy in times of crises until the 19th century Abstract This thesis focuses on financial policy during crises of the Bohemian Duchy, Kingdom of Bohemia, and Lands of the Bohemian Crown within The Austrian Empire until the 19th century. I will compare monetary and fiscal approaches to tackle the gravest crises caused by war, instability, or a financial breakdown. Therefore, in this thesis, I will analyse selected crises that took place in the Bohemian Duchy located in the Bohemian Kingdom at the end of the 13th century. I will focus on the Hussite wars, the great calada during the Thirty Years War, Napoleonic Wars, the Seven Years War, the Revolution of 1848, and the Long Depression, which started in 1873. The used methods are mainly comparison, analysis, and analogy. Results of the research indicate that an improper financial policy caused the majority of crises. Governmental approaches to solving fiscal, monetary and taxation problems were worsening the situation. Financial policy concerning monetary, fiscal, and tax policy until the end of the 19th century was procyclical. If enlightened politicians appeared in an era of prosperity, their plans for reforms were generally dashed by war and need for new governmental expenditures. However, the government, especially during the crisis, was prone...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".