MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7136094335

RDA (Resource Description and Access) - nowy standard katalogowania i jego wdrażanie w bibliotekach polskich = RDA (Resource Description and Access) - a new standard for cataloging and its implementation in Polish libraries

2018· other· pl· W7136094335 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maja Chocianowska-Sidoruk, Elżbieta Czarnecka

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital library of Zielona Gora (University of Zielona Góra) · 2018
Typeother
Languagepl
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRural Development Administration
KeywordsCatalogingResource Description and AccessSubject (documents)DeclarationInternational standardPlan (archaeology)National libraryRelation (database)Metadata
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors took up the subject of the RDA and the subject of the level of implementation of this model of cataloging in Polish libraries. The initial part of the article concerns the genesis of the RDA and its relation to the tradition of the Anglo-American principles of AACR cataloging. The authors emphasized the direct relationship with the third edition of the principles and discussed the essence of the revision of the plan of work of the Joint Steering Committee for RDA Development for the years 2005-2009. They also discussed the theoretical foundations of the new standard based on the conceptual models of FRBR and FRAD and on the Declaration of International Cataloging Principles. The rest of this article deals with the characteristics of fundamental changes in the current cataloging practice and their significance for the RDA as an international standard adapted to the digital world and compatible with the Semantic Web. The authors also deal with the subject of RDA implementation in the countries of Europe, the United States, Canada and Australia. The main part of this article is related to the topic of the next stages of RDA implementation in Polish libraries. The authors have attempted to compare the implementation model of the new standard in libraries which cooperate with the National Library and with the NUKAT Centre. They used the method of confronting the relevant bibliographic records of the National Library and NUKAT and confronted the speeches of the National Library and NUKAT Centre representatives at the conference "RDA Standard - benefits and problems related to its implementation". They analyzed the latest instruction, i.e. "The MARC Format of the 21 bibliographic record for the book" obliging libraries cooperating with the NUKAT Centre to implement subsequent RDA elements. At the end of this article, the authors define the current status of the RDA implementation as a transitional one and underline the difficulty of determining the direction of further changes related to the new cataloging paradigm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.038
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital library of Zielona Gora (University of Zielona Góra)French-language works237,207