Additional file 5: of Contrasting biological potency of particulate matter collected at sites impacted by distinct industrial sources
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cytotoxic responses of J774A.1 cells to 24 h exposure to size-fractionated particulate matter collected in the vicinity of industrial sites according to the resazurin reduction assay. Metabolic reduction of non-fluorescent resazurin in J774A.1 cells exposed for 24 h to size-fractionated and standard reference particles (left side) and extracts from corresponding field blank filters that were transported to each site but remained unexposed to ambient air (right side). Values are presented as average fold-effect (FE) over control ± standard error (n = 3 independent experiments). HB, Hamilton Beach steel mill; MA, Montréal petrochemical refinery; MC, Montréal copper smelter; SR, Sarnia petrochemical refinery; SW, Shawinigan aluminum smelter. Size-fractionated and standard reference particles. Three-way ANOVA (Size-fractionated particles): Site x Dose (p = 0.002) and Size x Dose (p < 0.001) interactions. Asterisks represent significant pairwise comparisons (Holm-Sidak) as follows: doses within Site significantly different from 0 μg/cm2, or sites within Size significantly different from one another as indicated by brackets (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.001). Letters (a-e) represent sizes within Site significantly different from one another (p < 0.05). Two-way ANOVA (Standards): Particle (p < 0.001) and Dose (p < 0.001) main effects. Asterisks represent significant pairwise comparisons (Holm-Sidak) as follows: doses significantly different from 0 μg/cm2, or particles significantly different from one another as indicated by brackets (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.001). Field blanks. Three-way ANOVA: Site x Size (p = 0.05) interaction. No significant pairwise comparisons (Holm-Sidak) were observed. (PDF 52 kb)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.998 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".