<b>FREQUENCY OF MENTAL NERVE PARESTHESIA IN PARASYMPHYSIS FRACTURES</b>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To identify the frequency of mental nerve injury in parasymphysis fractures. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mayo Hospital Lahore, over a period of six months. Methods: During study 78 patients were enrolled. The patients who reported to have anesthesia / hypoesthesia (numbness) of lower lip area on the affected side were considered to have mental nerve injury. Data was entered and analyzed in SPSS 26. Results: Among 78 patients, 89.7% were males and mean age was 32.69+10.523 years. The main cause of trauma among majority of patients (78.2%) was road traffic accident, 65.4% patients had simple fractures, 52.6% patients had presence of teeth for IMF and 21.8% patients had mental nerve injury. Association of mental nerve injury with clinical and fracture related characteristics showed significant results (P<0.05) regarding gender, fracture site, types of fractures and presence of teeth for IMF. Conclusion: Study concluded that the frequency of mental nerve injury was 21.8%. It was more prevalent among male patients and the most significant cause was road traffic accidents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".