Braiding Voices: The Hybrid Musical Identity of Inuk Soprano Deantha Edmunds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation investigates the musical identity of Inuk soprano, Deantha Edmunds. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada has issued Calls to Action for Indigenous language and culture, which extend to music institutions. Western art music academies hold a hegemonic power over the telling of Canadian music history and performance practice, effectively gatekeeping music at the highest academic level. Consequently, Edmunds’ music has been periodically met with confusion. Therefore, this study focuses on Edmunds’ hybrid musical identity, demonstrating the significance and resistance of her compositions and performances. As an embedded case study, this dissertation centres on Edmunds’ performance career, studying how her performances question early music performance practice and challenge Western art music listeners. This qualitative methodology illustrates that Edmunds enacts Calls to Action through her compositions and performances, a claim which is triangulated by personal interviews with Edmunds conducted by the author, literature reviews of the history and music of the Moravian Inuit, Indigenous sound studies, identity politics, and the music aesthetics of Truth and Reconciliation. Edmunds consistently uses her talent and position to uplift Inuit music traditions, and this research amplifies Edmund’s aspirations for Truth and Reconciliation through music. Key findings reveal that Edmunds’ compositions and performances reclaim and redefine the colonial construct of music performance. Her compositions, such as her album Connections (2022) and her song-cycle Angmalukisaa 2024, braid Indigenous aesthetics into Western art music, reaffirming historically discounted Inuit voices. For authentic Inuit translations, Edmunds turns to Inuit Elders for guidance, deepening her connection to her community and furthering her efforts for language revitalization. Her music and storytelling are rooted in Indigenous history, promoting Truth and Reconciliation. This research was made possible by Edmunds’ generous engagement with non-Indigenous listeners. This dissertation argues that Edmund’s music effectively reorients the definition of performance in Western art music. Leveraging her positionality, Edmunds creates a pathway to resilience for future Indigenous generations, especially her daughter Annabelle, whom she includes in her performances. In this way, Edmunds creates a living legacy that incites further research on listening positionality, performance theories, music scholarship, and Indigenous studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".