Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis consists of practice–led research in the form of a full-length script for a feature film; plus a 6,000-word essay (exegesis). A summary of the script is as follows: It is AD 61 and Rome rules the tribes of Britannia. The King of the Iceni tribe dies and his wife, Boadicea, becomes Queen. Grata, Boadicea’s younger sister, falls in love with Marcus, a Roman. The Romans disregard the King’s Will and demand all of the Iceni estate. Boadicea is flogged and her two daughters raped. Faolan, a traitorous Druid, joins the Iceni. Boadicea declares war on Rome and Grata runs away. Boadicea allies with Airic, chieftain of another tribe. After a successful attack on Camulodunum, Grata is found and Boadicea and Airic become lovers. Boadicea separates from Airic and other tribes join her army. Grata meets Ragar, a new chieftain. The army attacks Londinium. Supported by Grata, the new chieftains refuse to obey Boadicea and she seeks help from Faolan. The tribal army move on and attack Verulamium. Grata tries to kill Boadicea and flees to find Marcus. Faolan is denounced as a traitor and Boadicea kills him. She reconciles with Airic. Rejected by Marcus, Grata returns. Boadicea leads the Celts into battle against the Roman army but they are defeated. Grata is killed but Boadicea escapes. Later, Boadicea commits suicide to avoid capture. Airic follows her example. The script is framed by an Exegesis which is a 6,000-word essay on the subject of: a) the genre of the script. b) the development process from synopsis to second draft. NOTE: The thesis is approved by the Faculty of Culture and Society for an indefinite term embargo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".