Physical touch as an expression of faith in Jesus Christ in the Gospel according to Mark
Bibliographic record
Abstract
U odlomku Evanđelja po Marku (Mk 5,21-43) pronalazimo Isusa kako liječi bolesnu ženu i uskrišava mrtvu Jairovu kćer. Oba čuda događaju se doticanjem. U prvome čudu bolesna žena dotiče Isusovu haljinu, a u drugome čudu Isus dotiče mrtvu djevojčicu. Nije dovoljno samo dotaknuti Isusa, kako ga to mnoštvo pritišće i neosobno dotiče, nego je potrebno pokazati osobnu vjeru da bi Isus mogao učiniti čudo. Odlomak koji razmatramo kompleksan je tekst u kojemu se unutar jednoga pripovijedanja, to jest unutar izvještaja o bolesnoj Jairovoj kćeri, umeće drugi izvještaj o ozdravljenju bolesne žene, s ciljem rasta kulminacije u pripovijedanju u smjeru drugoga čuda, to jest uskrišenja Jairove kćeri. Glavna tema koja povezuje obje naracije jest „vjera“, s jedne strane žene bolesne od krvarenja, a s druge Jaira koji vjeruje umjesto mrtve kćeri i pokazuje zastupničku vjeru.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".