Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Prodigal Son is a documentary that explores how first-generation migrant parents have struggled to come to terms with their son's sexuality. When Ted came out as gay to his parents, his mother Ljubica insisted it was a passing phase and his father Alexo refused to speak to him. Fifteen years passed, with no communication between father and son, until Alexo discovered he was suffering from a serious illness. AWARDS: Flickerfest International Short Film Festival 2006 - WON: Best Documentary - Highly Commended - WON: Most Popular Film IF Awards 2006 - WON: Best Short Documentary Dendy Awards 2006, Highly Commended SCREENINGS: - Australia, 10 January 2006, Flickerfest International Short Film Festival - Australia, 19 January 2006, Mardi Gras Film Festival - Australia, 3 May 2006, TV premiere, SBS - Australia, 17 October 2006, Canberra Capital Queer Film Festival - USA, 6 May 2007, Miami Gay and Lesbian Film Festival - USA, 8 June 2007, Newfest New York LGBT Film Festival - USA, 16 November 2007, Reeling Chicago Gay Lesbian Film Festival - Australia, 16 March 2008, Melbourne Queer Film Festival - Canada, 19 October 2008, Macedonian Film Festival. The Prodigal Son, Written and Directed by Tony Radevski, produced by Tom Zubrycki, edited by Walter McIntosh. Funded by: Australian Film Commission, New South Wales Film & TV Office and SBS Independent. The Prodigal Son is available to the Staff and Students of the University of Notre Dame from St Benedict's Library, Sydney.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.141 | 0.050 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".