← Back to cohort
Refractory Ceramics for the Aluminium Foundries: Novel Perspectives for Greater Process and Product Sustainability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenueArchivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaterials Engineering and Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEnergy Frontier Research CentersOak Ridge National LaboratoryJST-Mirai ProgramPrecursory Research for Embryonic Science and TechnologyCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyFusion Energy SciencesBasic Energy SciencesNational Research, Development and Innovation OfficeFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesKorea Environmental Industry and Technology InstituteFonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’AgricultureScience and Engineering Research BoardHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaJunta de AndalucíaNational Science and Technology CouncilConseil Régional AquitaineMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchKorea Agency for Infrastructure Technology AdvancementUnitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si InovariiMinistério da EducaçãoMagnus Bergvalls StiftelseMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaIndian Institute of Technology BombayAgentúra na Podporu Výskumu a VývojaÖsterreichische ForschungsförderungsgesellschaftDivision of Materials ResearchEuropean Regional Development FundCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueYouth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of SciencesMinistry of Education, IndiaOffice of ScienceNarodowym Centrum NaukiKorea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and PlanningMinistry of DefenseMagyar Tudományos AkadémiaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCommercializations Promotion Agency for R and D OutcomesMinistry of EnvironmentMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaRoyal Academy of EngineeringFraunhofer-GesellschaftForschungszentrum JülichMinistry of Trade, Industry and EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Research Foundation of KoreaAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónAssociation Nationale de la Recherche et de la TechnologieYouth Innovation Promotion AssociationFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyChina Scholarship CouncilBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilEuropean CommissionMinistério da Educação e CiênciaCompanhia Brasileira de Metalurgia e MineraçãoVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVGrantová Agentura České RepublikyArmy Research OfficeAgence Nationale de la RechercheTokyo Institute of TechnologyDanmarks Tekniske UniversitetMinistry of Education - SingaporeEusko JaurlaritzaInnovationsfondenDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDipartimenti di EccellenzaNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaUniversity of LeedsNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalNational Research FoundationJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSHenry Royce InstituteSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónU.S. Department of EnergyFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaResearch Center for Biomedical EngineeringNational Science FoundationMinisterstvo obrany Slovenskej republikyUK Research and InnovationSlovenská Akadémia ViedInnovirisInstitute of Science and Technology AustriaKorea Institute for Advancement of TechnologyNazarbayev UniversityUniversity of Central FloridaAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsRefractory (planetary science)Process (computing)SustainabilityProduct (mathematics)AluminiumCeramic
DOInot available
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno