MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7139684586

Entoloma salmoneum

2021· article· W7139684586 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
White, Kathleen M., , 1962, Jacqueline Jergensen, Ada Lam

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Open Repository - Binghamton (Binghamton University) · 2021
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMossTaxonTaxonomy (biology)Phylogenetic treeSporeOrange (colour)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Saprobic; growing in moss under conifers and sometimes hardwoods, often growing on decaying conifer logs covered with moss. This specimen was collected in mossy leaf-litter under conifer trees. This species can be found through summer and fall and is widely distributed throughout Northeast America and Canada. This species grows alone or scattered. It has a distinctive pointed cap and vibrant orange-yellow color. Its cap is 1-3 cm wide with a bright salmon-orange color that fades to dirty yellow-orange with age and is sticky when young. This species’ gills are attached to the stem, distant, often short, and have the same color as the cap when it is young. Similar to the gills and cap, this species’ stem is salmon colored, although often a darker or dirtier shade. The stem is 4-10 cm long, 2 mm thick, hollow, and fragile. At the base of its stem, this species has a white to soft orange basal mycelium that connects to surrounding moss or leaf-litter. Additionally, this species has no distinctive odor or taste, is KOH negative, and has a pink spore print. This species is also known as Entoloma quadratum, Rhodophyllus lactifluus, Inocephalus quadratus and Nolanea quadrata as there is debate over this taxa and overlapping similarities (Kuo 2014). In order to properly understand how these species overlap and are morphologically similar, molecular research is needed. Having a singular species thought to include others from different genera is unusual and should be subject to further investigation. This may suggest that the phylogenetic relationships between these genera and species is convoluted and inaccurate. ID number: 11.13.01.2021

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Open Repository - Binghamton (Binghamton University)Same topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207