MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7139685271

In Brief

2002· article· W7139685271 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Education and Practice Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraduation (instrument)The artsLegal educationClass (philosophy)Supreme courtService (business)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Table of Contents: Dean's Message Masthead Leading the Way in Law, Technology, and the Arts Technology and Law: From the Classroom to the Courtroom and Beyond The Honorable Kathleen M. O'Mallley '82 as Distinguished Visiting Jurist... Lecture Series Spring 2002 In Review 2002-2003 Lecture Series Career Services Employment Statistics... Class of 2001 Employers Lewis R. Katz, The LL.M. in United States Legal Studies Program -- A Year in Review Reunion 2002 Law Alumni Reunion & Educational Seminar in London, England Save the Date Law Alumni Reunion 2003 The School of Law Annual Fund Alumni and Faculty Luncheon in Cleveland November 22, 2002 ... Regional Alumni Events Student News Canada-U.S. Law Institute Holds Its Sixteenth Annual Conference at the School of Law 2002 Commencement Order of the Coif Graduation Honors and Awards Faculty Briefs 2002-2003 New Faculty (Nance and Scharf) Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld Named Emeritus Professor Ollie Schroeder his "Favorite Teacher" We Thank Professors James McElhaney, Sidney Picker and Bryan Adamson for Their Years of Service to Our School Class Notes In Memoriam Rodney B. Pulliam, Class of 1999 1963-2002 Jeff Rice, '75 Umpires Super Bowl XXXVI Legacy Society Law Alumni Association School of Law Visiting Committee Calendar of Events

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8690.815

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLegal Education and Practice Innovations→French-language works237,207→