MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7139785161

Vesely v. Armslist

2013· article· W7139785161 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Bibliographic record

VenueeYLS (Yale Law School) · 2013
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGun Ownership and Violence Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommitShot (pellet)Forensic examinationPostal service
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On April 13, 2011, litka Vesel ("litka") was shot and killed in Illinois by Demetry Smirnov ("Smirnov"), a resident of Canada.Smirnov illegally purchased the handgun he used to commit the crime from a private seller, Benedict Ladera ("Ladera"), a resident of Seattle, Washington, who posted an advertisement for the handgun on armslist.com.Smirnov traveled to Seattle to meet Ladera and, although the handgun was advertised for $400 on armslist.com,Smirnov offered an "extra $200" "because he was from Canada."Compi.~ 34.In this diversity jurisdiction lawsuit, Plaintiff Alex Vesely, as special administrator and next of kin of litka ("Plaintiff') asserts three claims against Defendant Armslist, LLC ("Defendant"): (1) a Wrongful Death Act claim pursuant to 740 Ill.Compo Stat.180/0.01,et seq., alleging negligence;(2) a Survival claim pursuant to 755 Ill.Compo Stat.5/27-6 for pain and suffering occurring before litka Vesel died; and (3) a Family Expense claim under 750 Ill.Compo Stat.65/15 for funeral and burial expenses.Neither Ladera, nor Smirnov is a party to this action.Before the Court is Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).For the following reasons, the motion is granted.To survive a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), a complaint must allege "enough facts to state a claim to reliefthat is plausible on its face."Bell Atl.Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).That is, a plaintiff s complaint "must actually suggest that the plaintiff has a right to relief, by providing allegations that raise a right to relief above the speculative level."Indep.Trust Corp. v. Stewart Info.Servs.Corp., 665 F.3d 930,935 (7th Cir.2012) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).The Court accepts as true all well-pleaded facts in Plaintiffs complaint, and draws all reasonable inferences in his favor.Kolbe & Kolbe Health & Welfare BenefitPlan v. Med.ColI. of Wis., 657 F.3d 496,502 (7th Cir.2011).But the Court "need not accept as true legal conclusions, or threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeYLS (Yale Law School)Same topicGun Ownership and Violence ResearchFrench-language works237,207