MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Diagnosis and Therapeutic Management of Diabetes Mellitus in Canine

2025· article· en· W7140120711 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sahil Kumar, Gurlal Singh Gill

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Krishi Vigyan · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Medicine and Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyuriaPyometraPolydipsiaDiabetes mellitusAnorexiaInsulinDietary managementVomitingEndocrine diseaseDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractDiabetes mellitus (DM) is a common endocrine disorder affecting both canines and felines, characterized by persistent hyperglycemia and glucosuria due to either decreased production or decreased action of insulin or both. In this study, during the period of two years, a total of 2500 dogs were presented to the clinics and out of these 254 dogs were having primary complaint of polyuria and polydipsia. Among these a vast majority of the dogs were diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (58.2%) followed by hepatic disease (24.4%) and pyometra (09%) and only seven animals (2.7%) were diagnosed with DM based on persistent hyperglycemia (390.71mg/dL) and glucosuria (3+). Majority of these animals were females (n=5) and rest were males (n=2). The most commonly presented breeds were Dachshund (57.1%) followed by Labrador retriever (28.5%), pug and Shih-tzu (14.2% each) respectively. Most prevalent age group during this study was 4-5 years as all the females affected were falling in this age group. Rest of the two males were of 09 and 11 yrs, respectively. Clinical signs in these dogs included polyuria, polydipsia, weight loss in all the animals. Inappetence (71.4%), polyphagia (28.5%) and vomiting (28.5%) were seen uncommonly. Complications associated with DM in this study include cystitis (28.5%) and cataract (28.5%), respectively. Treatment was done based on American Animal Hospital Association (AAHA) guidelines with exogenous administration of insulin along with strict dietary management and implementation of exercise in routine schedules. Remission time in these dogs was 15 d and average dose of insulin was 0.63 IU/kg. The present study concluded the need of more elaborative studies as the present sample size was less and the importance of dietary management and exercise among pet owner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Krishi VigyanSame topicVeterinary Medicine and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207