MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7140144461 · doi:10.59195/lp.2017.64-53

Pietistische Lehrerbildung in der sorbischen Lausitz. Die Belowsche Schulanstalt in Großwelka und das Gräflich Dohnasche Institut in Uhyst/Spree

2017· article· W7140144461 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lubina Mahling

Bibliographic record

VenueLětopis – Zeitschrift für Sorabistik und vergleichende Minderheitenforschung · 2017
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMoravian Church and William Blake
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPietismContext (archaeology)Period (music)Aristocracy (class)Quarter (Canadian coin)Bildung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pietistic Teacher Education in the Sorbian Part of Lusatia – The Below School in Großwelka and the Dohna Institute of the Count in Uhyst/Spree The school in Großwelka, founded by August Adolph von Below in 1746, and the training college established by Heinrich Ludwig, Count of Dohna, in 1804, are often cited in the literature as the first Sorbian teaching establishments, however without placing in more detail the content and personnel of both institutions. Using a biographical approach, the present study puts the two institutions into the contemporary context placing them between Pietism and public enlightenment, and develops Connections between both institutions and the Halle orphanage, the Herrnhut Brotherhood, the pietistic aristocracy of Lusatia and educational reforms in Saxony. Particular attention is given to the significance of both institutions for Sorbian educational and cultural history; both educational establishments trained a large number of people who had a decisive influence on Sorbian religious and cultural life in the transitional period (Sattelzeit) leading to modernity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLětopis – Zeitschrift für Sorabistik und vergleichende MinderheitenforschungSame topicMoravian Church and William BlakeFrench-language works237,207