Impact of Compensation Management on Employee Job Satisfaction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study is to find out the common compensation management practices and their effect on job satisfaction of employees. The required data were collected by means of a structured questionnaire which was distributed to the employees from ten commercial banks. The methods used for data analysis were Descriptive statistics, Kendall’s Tau correlation, and multiple regression analysis. The study finds the relation between the compensation variables: salary, promotion, bonus, recognition, and job security along with their impact on job satisfaction of employees in commercial banks of Nepal. The result shows that the compensation variables are positively related to job satisfaction of employees, meaning higher the compensation variables higher the job satisfaction. Among these factors, job security was seen as the most influential factor for job satisfaction of employees. The findings suggest that both financial and non-financial compensation elements are important for job satisfaction of Nepalese commercial banks. This study provides practical guidance for bank management and adds empirical evidence to the limited research on compensation management in Nepal’s banking sector, especially in Sudurpaschim Province of Nepal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it