MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7141001340 · doi:10.46690/compes.2025.01.01

Advances in multiscale atomistic modelling for enhanced oil and gas recovery and CO₂ sequestration

2025· article· W7141001340 on OpenAlexaff
Jihong Shi, Tao Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueComputational energy science. · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFossil fuelEnhanced oil recoveryMolecular dynamicsShale gasMultiscale modelingAdsorptionAb initio

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A thorough understanding of gas-fluid interactions, competitive adsorption mechanisms, transport behaviour, and reactive transformations is fundamental for improving enhanced oil and gas production and ensuring permanent CO2 storage. The combined application of classical and ab initio molecular dynamics, grand-canonical Monte Carlo, and emerging machine learning approaches enables a comprehensive elucidation these mechanisms across multiple spatial and temporal scales. This view integrates our recent multiscale modelling efforts with state-of-the-art computational techniques to chart an agenda for predictive subsurface workflows. Document Type: Perspective Cited as: Shi, J., Zhang, T. Advances in multiscale atomistic modelling for enhanced oil and gas recovery and CO2 sequestration. Computational Energy Science, 2025, 2(1): 1-3. https://doi.org/10.46690/compes.2025.01.01 References Cygan, R. T., Liang, J., Kalinichev, A. G. Molecular models of hydroxide, oxyhydroxide, and clay phases and the development of a general force field. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004, 108(4): 1255-1266. Fentaw, J. W., Emadi, H., Hussain, A., et al. Geochemistry in geological CO2 sequestration: A comprehensive review. Energies, 2024, 17(19): 5000. Gbadamosi, A. O., Junin, R., Manan, M. A., et al. An overview of chemical enhanced oil recovery: Recent advances and prospects. International Nano Letters, 2019, 9: 171-202. Gong, L., Shi, J., Ding, B., et al. Molecular insight on competitive adsorption and diffusion characteristics of shale gas in water-bearing channels. Fuel, 2020, 278: 118406. Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. Journal of computational chemistry, 2006, 27(15): 1787-1799. Kühne, T. D., Iannuzzi, M., Del Ben, M., et al. CP2K: An electronic structure and molecular dynamics software package-Quickstep: Efficient and accurate electronic structure calculations. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2020, 152(19): 194103. Martin, M. G., Siepmann, J. I. Transferable potentials for phase equilibria. 1. United-atom description of n-alkanes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1998, 102(14): 2569-2577. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical review letters, 1996, 77(18): 3865-3868. Shi, J., Gong, L., Sun, S., et al. Competitive adsorption phenomenon in shale gas displacement processes. Rsc Advances, 2019, 9(44): 25326-25335. Shi, J., Zhang, T., Xie, X., et al. Characterizing competitive ad sorption and diffusion of methane and carbon dioxide in kerogen type-III slit model. Computational Geosciences, 2024, 28(5): 955-965. Shi, J., Zhang, T., Sun, S., et al. Ab initio insights into the CO2 adsorption mechanisms in hydrated silica nanopores. Chemical Engineering Science, 2025, 313: 121741. Sun, H. Compass: An ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1998, 102(38): 7338-7364. VandeVondele, J., Hutter, J. Gaussian basis sets for accurate calculations on molecular systems in gas and condensed phases. The Journal of chemical physics, 2007, 127(11): 114105. Zhang, T., Zhang, Y., Katterbauer, K., et al. Deep learning assisted phase equilibrium analysis for producing natural hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 50: 473-486.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputational energy science.Same topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207