Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo: "Deveria ser um galpão, conspicuamente banal, ou uma palhoça, definitivamente reles, para que ficasse impreterivelmente consagrado o que da Bahia dizem os seus detratores, que na Bahia nada não presta, que a Bahia é uma terra de bugres[?]" Com estas palavras, publicadas no Relatório e Anuário do Instituto de Cacau da Bahia em 1934, Arthur Neiva, Interventor do Estado da Bahia, justificava as onerosas instalações do edifício-sede do Instituto, então em construção. O edifício está localizado no bairro do Comércio em Salvador, nas proximidades do porto. Deveria abrigar um armazém para as sacas de cacau a serem exportadas pelo Instituto, os escritórios da administração e uma sala de reuniões para os associados. Mas havia mais. O principal objetivo do edifício, revelado nas palavras ufanistas acima citadas, era constituir o símbolo das atividades do Instituto, construindo uma imagem de grandeza em torno do comércio do cacau e, por conseguinte, exaltando a Bahia, responsável por 96% da produção nacional. Sua construção deveria ser o marco do ingresso da Bahia na modernidade e de sua consolidação como um dos estados produtores de peso na economia nacional, e mesmo mundial. Deste objetivo decorreriam várias escolhas feitas ao longo do projeto, como sua arquitetura de vanguarda e o emprego ostensivo das tecnologias mais avançadas da época. O edifício foi concebido não como um simples armazém, mas como uma máquina de armazenar, inteiramente mecanizada, que teve grande repercussão, tanto na época de sua construção quanto nos anos que se seguiram. Abstract: "Should it be merely a banal shed, or a definitively poor hut, so that it would be for ever obvious that in Bahia nothing is good, that Bahia is a wild land[?]" These words have been published at the Relatório e Anuário do Instituto de Cacau da Bahia in 1934 by Arthur Neiva, Governor of the State of Bahia, in order to justify the expensive installations of the main building of the Instituto, which was under construction at that time. The building is located in the Comércio District in Salvador, near the city port. It should house a warehouse for the cocoa sacks to be exported by the Instituto, as well as the administration offices and a meeting room for the associates. But there was more to it. The main aim of the building, which can be perceived in the praising words above, was to symbolize the activities of the Instituto, constructing an image of greatness about the cocoa business, and, as a consequence, praising the State of Bahia, which was responsible for 96% of the national production. Its construction should be a sign of the entrance of Bahia in the modern times and its consolidation as one of the most important states for the country economy, and even for the world economy. This aim would be the reason of various choices which have been made along the project, such as its modern architecture and the vast use of the most advanced technologies of the time. The building was designed not to be a simple warehouse, but an entirely mechanized storage machine, which became well- known at the time it was built, and even later on.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".