MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7143627392 · doi:10.24727/00027609

マット運動における前方倒立回転跳びの指導法に関する研究 : 中学校1年生男子を対象として

2005· article· ja· W7143627392 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
雅文 藤田, 政弘 北川, Masafumi FUJITA, Masahiro Kitagawa

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldMedicine
TopicSports injuries and prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFace (sociological concept)Quarter (Canadian coin)Degree (music)Significant differenceFront (military)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to examine the effective methods of teaching the handspring in mat exercises. Tow physical education teachers with long experience as gymnastics players instructed the handspring in mat exercises five times to 222 first-year boys in two public junior high schools. The difference of the learning results between three methods of the different type that were the method with the difference in elevation, the approach by cartwheel with quarter front twist, and the whole method, were analyzed. The relations between the degree of attainment on the handspring and three items of physical strength (50m run, clapping of hands in position lying face down, trunk extension), Rohrer's index, were analyzed. The results were summarized as follows ; 1) About 60% of the boys improved their skill of the handspring in mat exercises. The significant difference of the learning results between three methods of the different type did not show. 2) The approach by cartwheel with quarter front twist was easy to teach the handspring in mat exercises. The reason was as follows ; The teachers were able to instruct the handspring without labor to remove many vaulting horses, and without labor to guide students in their spotting techniques. They were able to instruct safely in student's various ability. 3) The significant correlations were observed between the degree of attainment on the handspring and three items of physical strength. The correlation between the degree of attainment on the handspring and clapping of hands in position lying face down was most strongest. This result gave a suggestion that the training for jumping by hands was necessary to become skillful at the handspring. 4) 44.7% of the boys from over 100 to under 140 in Rohrer's index became skillful at the handspring. On the other hand, 13.3% of the boys over 140 in Rohrer's index became skillful at the handspring. This result gave a suggestion that the handspring was difficult exercise for the overweight boys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicSports injuries and preventionFrench-language works237,207