Hidden Logic among Corporate Social Responsibility, Socially Related Investment and Donation: Fundamental Reasons for Inactiveness of These Socially Related Activities in Japan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been getting increasing attentiveness and greater interest of people among many countries in the world until now. This tendency does not change in different countries even if they are categorized in developed or developing countries. There is, however, clear difference around the attitude toward CSR between two kinds of capitalism: Anglo-American capitalism (United Kingdom, U.S.A. Canada, Australia, most Asian and Middle/South American countries, etc.) and Rhein-Alpen capitalism (Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Italia, Japan, etc.), the former being very much to do with the disclosure of CSR related information, while the latter with the CSR activities themselves as their own prime activities. Where does this significant difference come from? Moreover, it seems obvious in Japan that the willingness of people to pay for securities investment and its economic performance have been greatly lower than that of most developed countries like United Kingdom or U.S.A. which belong to Angro-American capitalism countries. This tendency is especially clear when compared with those of saving activities. Furthermore, donation made by people, which is apparently nothing to do with securities investment of them, is also unpopular and inactive in Japan (like in almost all German speaking countries etc.) compared with that of other English speaking countries. This paper will focus on German management and accounting theories of E. Schmalenbach etc. which placed much importance on humanities and labor. The paper also focuses on fundamental context of a well-known typology of French management researcher M. Albert which divides current capitalism into Anglo-American capitalism and Rhein-Alpen capitalism. By these minute consideration the fundamental reasons of inactiveness of CSR related corporate information, securities investment and donation in Japan will be investigated, and the possible means to improve the present situation can be proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".