MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7144320748 · doi:10.20736/0002001127

The 3rd SPARC Japan Seminar 2013 "Redefining the Impact of Research Outputs in the Age of Open Access: Current State of Reuse and Altmetrics" Altmetrics: The next step for open access Presentation Material

2013· article· en· W7144320748 on OpenAlexaff
Jason R Priem

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Canadian institutionsImpactOpenAlex
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)ReuseState (computer science)Current (fluid)Key (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

第3回 SPARC Japan セミナー2013「オープンアクセス時代の研究成果のインパクトを再定義する:再利用とAltmetricsの現在」 開催場所:国立情報学研究所 12階 1208,1210会議室 日時:2013年10月25日(金)10:00~17:00

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.033
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Bibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0330.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0190.016
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.413
GPT teacher head0.559
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainEvaluation
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicAcademic Publishing and Open AccessFrench-language works237,207