Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multifarious factors such as continuing economic advances, increasing national income, and enlarging cultural exchange between nations have contributed to the outstanding growth of the air transportation industry in Korea. However, as the air transportation industry has matured, private legal conflicts associated with it have also become fiercer, and it is easy to predict that conflicts will be more serious in the future. What is worse, the lack of laws to regulate these legal relationships has produced a lot of confusion. Accordingly, there is an urgent need to repair this legal crisis for three main reasons. This paper presents these three reasons. Firstly, those provisions on the case of aircraft accidents had fundamental limitation to maintain legal safety because the agreements easily lose their validity. Consequently, air carrier services in Korea require immediate action to enact laws related this situation. Secondly, Korea is a signatory of the Hague Protocol 1995 and the Montreal Convention1999, these protocols and conventions will be applied when a conflict takes place between Korea and other high contracting parties. However, when an international air transportation-related conflict occurs between Korea and a party that has not signed onto the aforementioned agreements, the dispute cannot be resolved by those agreements. Accordingly, there is an urgent need to iron out this difficulty that arises from this state of legal panic by developing better municipal transportation laws. Moreover, when the two treaties can be applied in one situation in the field of international air transportation, the only way to clarify the problem is by adopting municipal laws if there is any allowance for that in the treaties. It requires to establish a new municipal law which can surely deal with problems. Thirdly, there is a requirement on the rise to protect third parties on the surface who are damaged by aircraft. In Korea, thought, there is any express provision or law to regulate such protections, and this aspect causes the conclusion that we only have one solution to settle the problem, which is to apply limited liability though Korean Civil Law concerning cases of unlawful acts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".