MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7144897470

Frustration and magnetism of the zigzag chain compounds EuL2O4 (L = Yb, Lu, Gd, Eu)

2011· article· en· W7144897470 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Oren Ofer, Jun Sugiyama, Jess H. Brewer, Eduardo J. Ansaldo, Martin Må̊nsson, Kim H. Chow, Kazuya Kamazawa, Yoshihiro Doi, Yukio Hinatsu

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJapan Atomic Energy AgencyJapan Proton Accelerator Research ComplexTRIUMF
KeywordsLanthanideAntiferromagnetismZigzagMagnetismMagnetic momentFrustrationChain (unit)Phase (matter)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present muon-spin rotation/relaxation and susceptibility measurements on polycrystalline samples of EuL2O4, where L is the lanthanide Yb, Lu, Gd, or Eu. The magnetic phase of these quasi-one-dimensional zigzag chain compounds is characterized with respect to the difference in their lanthanide magnetic moment. We find that the magnetic phase varies systematically with the lanthanide magnetic moment. At zero lanthanide moments (EuLu2O4), we find a static antiferromagnetic phase; as the moment increases, the phase gradually changes to an incommensurate spin-density-wave ordered phase, and finally reaches a dynamic phase, when large lanthanide magnetic moments are present (EuGd2O4).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207