MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7145207382

ウエルパーミアメータ法を用いた砂地ほ場での透水係数の測定

2001· article· ja· W7145207382 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
俊広 森井, 智 松本, 敬幸 森

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Identification (biology)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

砂地ほ場で、ゲルフ式ウェルパーミアメータ(GP)法の適用性を調べた。当試験法は、 1985年前後にカナダのGuelph大学の研究グループによって開発されたもので、オーガーで掘削した半径教 cm 程度のウェル内に一定水位を保ち、そのときに生じる定常浸潤量を測定して、ほ場における飽和透水係数 K_ を測定するものである。一連の試験より、測定装置のシンプルさ、測定の簡便さと迅速性といった原位置試験法としての優れた性能を確認できた。測定精度も、十分に実務的なものであった。深さ140cm まで実施した GP法からえられたK_ と、その後に掘削したトレンチでの土層断面の観察結果および採取コア土の透水係数との対比を行った。GP法は、試験条件と土質に応じた測定領域をもつため、層構造をもつほ場では、この測定額域に含まれる土層を平滑したようなK_ を算出すること、また砂地ほ場のように相対的に透水性の高い土壌では、主に鉛直方向の透水係数を測定することが分かった。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.012
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207