平成19年度『第4回日豪トラック1.5安全保障対話』報告書（英文)2007.12.10-11
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Securing the safety of sea lanes in the Asia-Pacific region is certainly important for the regional economy and regional security, but sea lanes do not end in one single region.The major sea lanes, which are the lifeline of Japan, extend far beyond the regional seas, into the Indian Ocean, Oceania-South Pacific, and East Pacific regions.The need to ensure the safety of broad sea lanes is not likely to diminish in the future, but will grow.At the same time, various factors that obstruct sea lane safety are becoming more evident everywhere in the region and in the world.In this sense, it is important to ensure that the world can benefit from 'managed maritime freedom' under known rules built by consensus among relevant countries.This is easy to understand, but difficult to realise.Because sea lanes connect one region to another through oceans, it is urgently necessary to build a consensus among broader regional beneficiary countries Proceedings to seek common benefits and to cooperate to ensure sea lane safety.Among major sea lanes adjacent to Japan, those in the Oceania, South Pacific, and East Pacific regions are relatively stable, with no significant threats.In those regions, the US maintains overwhelming influence from bases in Hawaii, Guam, and the west coast of the US.The presence of other major sea power allies, such as Australia and Canada, also ensures the stability of these sea lanes.If there is any potential threat in these regions, it may be China's aggressive military advancement toward the Pacific Ocean as it continues its rise as a major world power.China's activities will require continued attention.In this sense, the alliance among major Pacific sea powers (Japan, Australia, and Canada), with the world's largest and strongest sea power, the US, at the centre will be significant in securing the safety of sea lanes in the pan-Pacific region.The alliance with Australia will be especially significant, as it maintains strong relationships with Asian nations, including Japan, not only in the area of sea lane security but also in the overall area of regional security.Considering the recent international economic and security situation, Australia is one of the most important allies in the 'expanded Asia,' extending from south to north. The Japanese approach to an East Asian Community and Japan-Australia partnership
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.479 | 0.539 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".