Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) at its 11th session and the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its first session (2005), at Montreal, signified a successful start into a new era of international climate policy. Much literature has been published offering proposals on what should be done with a post-2012 regime. Most of them mention the importance of enhancing adaptation policy. Adaptation as a strategy to cope with impact of climate change is increasingly the focus of policy action at each level. Developing countries, including Small Islands Developing States, urge to amplify the adaptation policy in the UNFCCC framework. It has been indicated the needs for an international mechanism for assisting the Parties to adapt to climate change at local level suitable to their sustainable development strategy. This article summarizes concepts of adaptation and adaptive capacity in the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, introduces treatments of adaptation in the UNFCCC and the Kyoto protocol, and shows proposals on adaptation policy options in the future regime. Finally it presents the points at issue on adaptation policy for discussing post-2012 framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".