MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7146720058

プレート沈込み型地震に対する半特異面数学モデルの構築

2024· article· en· W7146720058 on OpenAlexaff
Tateaki Sasaki, Masaru Sanuki, Daiju Inaba

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutions123 Certification (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlate tectonicsSubductionPoint (geometry)GeodynamicsPlate theoryEuler's formulaPacific PlateFault (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1750, great mathematician Leonhard Euler developed a comprehensive theory of the motion of a point mass, a massive rigid body, a massive elastic body, and massive fluid (with no viscosity), under a given force [2, 3]. It is amazing that, even now, Euler's system for the earthquake waves requires no change, although it is pretty complicated. Unfortunately, Euler's system has no mechanism of causing the earthquake; the plate tectonics was not known in Euler's era. This paper clarifies the limitations of Euler's system and searches for the origin of big earthquakes. The earthquake of plate-subduction type occurs between a “continental plate” and a “ocean plate”, where the latter subducts the former. We image that the ocean plate is the Pacific plate and the continental plate is the North American plate which covers the north half of Japan. In this case, the ocean plate approaches the continental plate at a speed of about 8 cm/year. In the subduction, both plates touch each other and they slide, without breaking others largely; see Figure 1 in the text. Hence, two plates facing each other have a thin “fault”(断層 in Japanese) between them. First, we express the above situation mathematically. As the 0-th approximation, we assume that the fault width is zero in subduction zone. Then, the plate boundary, let it be 𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧), is settled uniquely. The plates above and below 𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧) are of different speeds, hence 𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧) is a singular plane. Actually, both plates are apart from each other a little. The gap between two plates was measured to be about 8 cm at a point near the Japan trench; see the text around Figure 2. So, we introduce a gap-function 𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧) which simulates the gap, and we replace 𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧) by 𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧). The second point of this paper is the “asperity” proposed by Theme Lay and Hiroo Kanamori in 1980. Asperities are big bumps on the surface of ocean plate. Lay and Kanamori insist that the asperities make the ocean and continental plates “locked”(固着した in Japanese), which is the main reason of big earthquakes. The surface of Pacific plate became clear after 1990s by development of the method of investigating structure of the underground of sea, see Figure 2 in the text. Setting the surface of ocean plate by imitating Figure 2, we propose a realistic model of the plate-locking. Finally, we must say that Euler's system will be refined again and again in future, because we have so far considered neither thermodynamics nor big destruction of the plate itself.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)→Same topicearthquake and tectonic studies→French-language works237,207→