An autoregulation loop in fust-1 for circular RNA regulation in Caenorhabditis elegans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many circular RNAs (circRNAs) are differentially expressed in different tissues or cell types, suggestive of specific factors that regulate their biogenesis. Here, taking advantage of available mutation strains of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) in Caenorhabditis elegans, I performed a screening of circRNA regulation in 13 conserved RBPs. Among them, loss of FUST-1, the homolog of Fused in Sarcoma (FUS), caused downregulation of multiple circRNAs. By rescue experiments, I confirmed FUST-1 as a circRNA regulator. Through RNA sequencing using circRNA-enriched samples, circRNAs targets regulated by FUST-1 were identified globally, with hundreds of them significantly altered. Furthermore, I showed that FUST-1 regulates circRNA formation with only small to little effect on the cognate linear mRNAs. When recognizing circRNA pre-mRNAs, FUST-1 can affect both exon-skipping and circRNA in the same genes. Moreover, I identified an autoregulation loop in fust-1, where FUST-1, isoform a (FUST-1A) promotes the skipping of exon 5 of its own pre-mRNA, which produces FUST-1, isoform b (FUST-1B) with different N-terminal sequences. FUST-1A is the functional isoform in circRNA regulation. Although FUST-1B has the same functional domains as FUST-1A, it cannot regulate either exon-skipping or circRNA formation. This study provided an in vivo investigation of circRNA regulation, which will be helpful to understand the mechanisms that govern circRNA formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".