MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7147391543 · doi:10.4314/thrb.v25i1.5

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Abortion among Adolescent female students in selected Secondary Schools in Moshi municipality, Kilimanjaro region.

2023· article· W7147391543 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frank Albert Kimbwereza, Jesca Sael Nkya, Andrew Lelo Mboya, Bernard Njau

Bibliographic record

VenueTanzania journal of health research/Tanzania Journal of Health Research · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbortionUnsafe abortionFamily planningPregnancyIncidence (geometry)Quarter (Canadian coin)Descriptive statisticsPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Induced abortion is an intentional termination of intrauterine pregnancy by medical or surgical means. Unsafe abortion is a serious public health problem most significant for adolescent females and one of the leading causes of maternal mortality globally. In Africa, unsafe abortion accounts for more than a quarter of causes of maternal mortality. Tanzania, where abortion is illegal, has the highest incidence of unsafe abortion. This study aimed to determine the knowledge, attitude, and practices towards induced abortion among adolescent female students in four selected secondary schools in Moshi municipality, Kilimanjaro region, Northern Tanzania. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 342 secondary school girls aged 15-19 years from April to June 2019. A multistage sampling technique selected eligible participants. Semi-structured, self-administered questionnaires were used for data collection. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS software. Results: The mean age of respondents was 16.7(SD 3.7), and 50.6% (n= 173/342; mean knowledge score =38.9 ±1.4) had inadequate knowledge of induced abortion. More than half, 55.8% (n= 191/342; mean attitude score = 18.9 ± 1.9) had unfavourable attitudes towards induced abortion. Nineteen respondents had induced abortion from unplanned pregnancies. The two main reasons for induced abortion were to finish school (26.3%), and fear of parents’ reactions (26.3%). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the level of knowledge on induced abortion among study participants. However, the unfavourable attitude towards induced abortion observed is mostly influenced by cultural and religious factors. Two main reasons for induced abortion were fear of termination from school and fear of parents’ reactions. Comprehensive sexuality education, contraception counselling and provision, access to post-abortion care services, and parent-daughter communication interventions may be beneficial to prevent unplanned pregnancies may be beneficial to adolescent students attending secondary schools in this setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.318
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.059
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3180.059
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.000
Bibliometrics0.0150.018
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.271
GPT teacher head0.540
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTanzania journal of health research/Tanzania Journal of Health ResearchSame topicReproductive Health and ContraceptionFrench-language works237,207