Minerva, the Queen and the Grandees of Spain: Opera and Politics in Sebastián Durón’s <i>La guerra de los gigantes</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article examines Sebastián Durón’s opera La guerra de los gigantes ( c. 1701–3) in the context of the early years of the War of the Spanish Succession (1701–14) and Philip V’s reign (1701–46), as well as the development of opera in Madrid. It presents three main arguments. First, I argue that the character of Minerva in this opera was intended to symbolise Maria Luisa Gabriela of Savoy (1688–1714), the bride and future queen consort of Spain. The aristocrat who commissioned La guerra de los gigantes sought to portray Maria Luisa not only as an ideal wife and woman but also as a powerful military and political ally to King Philip V during the war. Second, I propose that La guerra de los gigantes is part of a broader ‘theatre of loyalty’ that emerged during the early years of Philip V’s reign and the War of the Spanish Succession. This type of theatre allowed Spanish noblemen, particularly the grandees, to express their allegiance to their new king, gain his favour, and enhance or solidify their power. Finally, I suggest that La guerra de los gigantes represents one of several attempts by the Spanish high nobility to develop the genre of opera in Madrid, at a time when partly sung musical dramas such as the zarzuela were the dominant theatrical forms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".