MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7148222591

Indoor Concentrations and Sources of Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds in the Context of Vulnerable Populations

2025· dissertation· W7148222591 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sara Vaezafshar

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWorld Health Organization
KeywordsContext (archaeology)PesticideIndoor airExposure assessmentPollutant
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

People are widely exposed to semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in indoor environments, where concentrations are typically higher than outdoors. Some SVOCs, such as pesticides, ortho-phthalate (PAEs) plasticizers, organophosphate esters (OPEs) used as flame retardants and plasticizers, as well as benzophenones (BPs), salicylates (SALs), and phenolic benzotriazoles (PBs) used as UV filters, are known or suspected to have health impacts with various indoor sources, including building materials and consumer products. Indoor exposure to SVOCs is a significant concern, particularly in North America, where individuals spend over 90% of their time indoors. This thesis aims to enhance our understanding of residential exposure to selected SVOCs from indoor sources in context of vulnerable populations, notably residents of low-income social housing and young children in sleeping microenvironments (SME).Particle-bound concentrations of legacy and current use pesticides quantitatively estimated in low-income social housing in Toronto, Canada, using portable air cleaners equipped with quantitative filter forensics (QFF). Elevated levels of legacy and current use pesticides were measured at levels higher than previously reported, despite long after restrictions. Apart from intentional use of pesticides to control pests, through pest eradication programs or/and by residents themselves, smoking tobacco among residents were identified as sources of indoor herbicide presence. This thesis also confirmed mattress as a source for children early-life exposures to PAEs, OPEs, and UV-filters in SMEs. The emissions of SVOCs were found to increase as a function of children's body temperature and weight, leading to elevated exposure during sleeping. Numbers of newly purchased children’s mattresses, through product testing, were found to either not comply with Canadian regulations for children's mattresses or to be near non-compliance. Factors such as bedroom characteristics, SME contents, and the use of personal care products were also correlated with the levels of some SVOCs in children's SMEs. This thesis found exposures of residents of low-income households and young children to selected SVOCs of concern, reinforcing the importance of better understanding the available sources indoors, as well as the factors contributing to SVOC levels, including building characteristics, use of consumer products, and individual habits, with the aim of reducing exposures in an equitable manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals→French-language works237,207→