Unwürde, Lubij, Dažin, Stwěšin und andere Namen altsorbischer Herkunft. Miszellanea und manches Systemhafte (Teil II)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unwürde, Lubij, Dažin, Stwěšin and Other Names of Old Sorbian origin. Miscellanea and Some Arguments of a Systemic Nature (Part II) Onomastic analysis should interpret the entire development of a name; it should not be limited to the recent form nor to the oldest one, for all forms have their own causal background (Šmilauer). It seems that in the modern literature about Lusatian place names this rule has not always been sufficiently obeyed. So, in a number of cases, new Sorbian forms have been explained as being caused by the influence of Germanized ones, although an inner Sorbian development could well have led to a given later state. Furthermore, a satisfactory solution cannot always be provided by simply “making a calculation”, starting either from the oldest form and moving forward, or going back from the latest one. In this sense, in the 2nd section alternative interpretations of Dažin and Dźěžnikecy, Njeznarowy, Łuwoćicy, Lutobč, Radska, Zemicy and Tumicy are proposed. Attention is paid to some names whose history includes an unexplained disappearance or the appearance of a particular sequence. Certain aspects of Njeswačidło and the Coswig names were re-examined. An interesting solution was found in the case of the “mysterious” name Stwěšin, which suggests that it is derived from a hypocorism of an older Slavonic borrowing of Stephanus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it