MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7149215921

Winter Diet of a Long-Eared Owl in Northeast Tennessee

2019· article· W7149215921 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard L. Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2019
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEctothermOverwinteringArcticExclosure
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Long-eared Owl (Asio otus) is a widespread Holarctic species whose normal breeding range in eastern North America extends south from Canada to southern Wisconsin, southern Michigan, and into Pennsylvania (Marks et al. 1994, Weidensaul 2015).The species is both migratory and nomadic (Weidensaul 2015).In the East, its winter range extends south to Tennessee, Virginia, and North Carolina, and rarely farther south to Georgia and the Gulf coast (Weidensaul 2015).In Tennessee it has generally been considered to be a rare winter resident (Somershoe and Sloan 2015).A search of The Migrant revealed 56 records scattered statewide in at least 25 counties dating from the 1920s through 2018, attesting to its status as rare in Tennessee.However, it is likely that others go undetected due to this owl's nocturnal habits, retiring nature, poorly known calls, and preference for roosting in dense vegetation.Analysis of pellets is a standard method of studying the diet of owls.Most large and medium-sized owls, including Long-eared, typically swallow small vertebrate and invertebrate prey items whole.Undigested parts, such as bones, fur, feathers, and chitinous arthropod exoskeletons, are cast into a pellet that is regurgitated.Long-eared Owls specialize on small mammalian prey (Marti 1976), thus pellet analysis should yield accurate diet composition.While food studies of the Long-eared Owl in North America are numerous (Marti 1976, Marks et al. 1994, and references therein), most are from Canada or the northern and western United States, with few from the southeast.Two diet studies come from Kentucky (Abel and Ritchison 1995, Machniak andElliot 1997), but there is just one from Tennessee.Klippel and Parmalee (1982) examined 71 complete pellets and numerous loose bones taken from underneath a Long-eared Owl roost in Maury County in middle Tennessee.The roost was used for parts of three consecutive winters.The following is a pellet analysis for a site in northeast Tennessee occupied by a Long-eared Owl for part of one winter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)→Same topicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies→French-language works237,207→