The Spring Season
Bibliographic record
Abstract
March was one of the warmest on record statewide, with new high temperature marks set in numerous locations.As a result, vegetation emerged earlier by three weeks or more.e following two months were also generally warmer than usual.A brief cold snap in mid-April brought frost to some areas, but was only a minor setback.Numerous new early arrival dates were established in various sections of the state.However, overall numbers of migrants seemed low.us it is likely that the warm temperatures, favorable winds, and general lack of rains during the peak of migration allowed many migrants to pass over the state before stopping.Early breeding also was noted for some species.Could a Brown Pelican on Cordell Hull Lake have been the same individual seen near Chattanooga?ree reports of Northern Goshawk were surprising.A potential new nesting pair of Peregrine Falcons was located in the mountains.A handfull of Common Gallinules were scattered through East Tennessee, where typically quite scarce.Whitewinged Doves appeared in three regions, as this species continues to increase as a vagrant in the state.Two Cave Swallows were seen near Memphis, while a Yellow-headed Blackbird was observed near Chattanooga. Standard Abbreviationsad -adult lrs -latest reported sighting Co -County max -maximum count Cr -Creek m.ob.-many observers ers -earliest reported sighting Mtn -Mountain et al.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".