MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7149233194

The Winter Season

2005· article· W7149233194 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard L. Knight, W. Robert Peeples, Phillip D. Casteel, Richard P. Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2005
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEarthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowFlockWaterfowlWinter seasonSubspeciesHunting seasonGooseSeasonal breederArctic
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dominant weather theme across the state this winter was mild temperatures.Precipitation varied only slightly from normal.Very little snowfall occurred outside the eastern mountains.With the recent split recognizing Cackling Goose as a full species, birders are now forced to look closer at all winter flocks of Canada Geese.This season observers turned up Cackling Geese at three sites in West Tennessee and, more surprisingly, in Sullivan and Washington counties of upper East Tennessee.To my knowledge, all of the Cackling Geese reported this season were of the Richardson's subspecies (hutchinsii), the most expected form in Tennessee since it breeds as far east as the central Canadian Arctic, although the Alaskan-breeding form minima has been reported previously in the state (e.g., Migrant 74:52, 2003).Duck numbers were generally low, but several scoters were found.Boreal irruptives were represented by a few Red-breasted Nuthatches, Purple Finches, and Pine Siskins.Lingering species included Osprey, Sanderling, Common Nighthawk, Blue-gray Gnatcatcher (two regions), Yellow-throated Warbler, Northern Waterthrush, Summer Tanager, and Rose-breasted Grosbeak.A notable late winter concentration of gulls in Lake County held California, Thayer's, and Iceland gulls.Other noteworthy rarities included Northern Goshawk (hvo regions), Allen's Hummingbird, Vermilion Flycatcher, and Snow Bunting.A few early returning swallows in three regions signaled the approach of spring. ad -adult Standard Abbreviations L -LakeCBC -Christmas Bird Count Co -County Cr -Creek ers -earliest reported sighting et al. -and others fide -reported by im -immature 77 m.ob.-many observers max -maximum count

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)Same topicEarthquake and Disaster Impact StudiesFrench-language works237,207