MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gyroscope and Accelerometer based Assistive Spoon for Motor Disorder Patients

2025· article· W7151384608 on OpenAlexaff
C.Selvarathi, P.Pandiaraja, C.Ushapriya, Senthilkumar R, B.T.Annapoorani, R. Deebika

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccelerometerGyroscopeMotor activityMotor controlElectromyography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson's disease is a neurodegenerative disorder that affects motor function, leading to hand tremors during simple tasks such as eating. In this project, it is proposed to create an AI augmented self-stabilizing spoon for Parkinson's patients to help them regain autonomy while eating. The device is fitted with inertial measurement sensors, such as gyroscopes and accelerometers, which sense real time movement of the hand. The sensor data is processed by a machine learning model to distinguish between voluntary hand movements and involuntary tremors. When tremors are identified, the built in micro actuators control the spoon head position to stabilize it and prevent spills while facilitating smoother meal consumption. The proposed research work mainly focused three base classifiers, namely Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and 1D Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN), The AI system learns users distinct tremor patterns for individualized support. Ergonomically and user friendly in design, the spoon is light, transportable, and can be recharged. It also has the possibility of wireless capability, with data logging and monitoring by carers or health professionals. The final aim is to improve the quality of life for Parkinson's sufferers by enabling autonomy and minimizing frustration at mealtimes. Future enhancements will be aimed at improving the AI model, enhancing battery life, and linking the gadget with mobile health applications for ongoing assistance and monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyFrench-language works237,207