Land Use Change on the Golden Triangle Area, Kuningan, South Jakarta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jakarta merupakan kota metropolitan dengan gedung-gedung tinggi (apartemen, kosan, pusat perbelanjaan – fasilitas perdagangan), khususnya didalam kawasan Segitiga Emas Kuningan dikelilingi oleh gedung perkantoran, fasilitas perdagangan dan jasa, dan mixed-use development yang dikuasai oleh pembangunan dengan intensitas bangunan melibihi 100.000 m2. Tujuan pada penelitian ini adalah mengidentifikasi perubahan pemanfaatan lahan pada kawasan RW 07, Karet Kuningan, Jakarta Selatan mulai tahun 2002 sampai 2021. Metode yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif deskriptif, sedangkan pengumpulan data menggunakan metode wawancara, observasi lapangan, dokumentasi, dan data sekunder dari instansi pemerintah seperti Dinas Cipta Karya, Tata Ruang, dan Pertahanan DKI Jakarta. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa perubahan yang terjadi pada kawasan studi adalah: penggunaan lahan yang tidak sesuai, perubahan fungsi bangunan, serta ketidaksesuaian KLB, KDB, dan KDH pada lokasi studi. Studi ini diharapkan dapat menjadi masukkan kepada pemerintah daerah khususnya DKI Jakarta untuk evaluasi kembali peraturan yang sudah ada dengan kondisi lapangan serta untuk meningkatkan kembali revisi RDTR 2030 khususnya pada wilayah DKI Jakarta
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".