THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL MEDIA AND VIRAL MARKETING TOWARD PURCHASE DECISION AT SHOPEE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Technology opens new channel namely E-commerce that allows its consumer to make purchase decisions through mobile phones. Shopee revenue reported to be fluctuated and decreased at the fourth quarter of 2021 to first quarter of 2022. The company also experienced an increase in losses in the first quarter of 2020, first quarter of 2021 and first quarter of 2022. This research aims to understand the effect of social media and viral marketing toward purchase decision at Shopee. This research uses quantitative data which use questionnaire from the sample of 100 Diponegoro University Students who use Shopee. This research is using non probability sampling and data analyzed using SPSS. The discussion resulted that the social media variable have positive significant influence on the purchase decision, the viral marketing variable have positive significant influence on the purchase decision, the social media and viral marketing variable simultaneously have positive significant influence on the purchase decision. The company are recommend to increase the social media and viral marketing also for further research it is recommend to explore more about the respondent identity.Keywords: Purchase Decision; Social Media; Viral Marketing
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".