MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7152697279 · doi:10.66584/eip2025-259

DISTINCTIVE PHENOTYPIC FEATURES OF WAARDENBURG SYNDROME: A CLINICAL CASE REPORT WITH PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION

2025· article· W7152697279 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ana Oliveira Lemos, Catarina Mendonça, Rita Pissarra, Mariana Rocha Andrade, Rita Santos Silva, Cíntia Castro-Correia

Bibliographic record

VenueExcellence in Pediatrics Abstracts · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicmelanin and skin pigmentation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensorineural hearing lossWaardenburg syndromeHearing lossCongenital hearing lossDevelopmental MilestoneGenetic testingPresentation (obstetrics)Ethnic groupFamily history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Waardenburg syndrome is a rare genetic disorder, most often inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, affecting approximately 1 in 40,000 individuals and accounting for 2–5% of congenital hearing loss. It occurs across all ethnic groups and shows no gender predilection. Pathogenic mutations disrupt the migration and proliferation of neural crest cells, affecting melanocytes in the eyes, skin, hair, and the stria vascularis of the cochlea. Key clinical features include congenital sensorineural hearing loss, heterochromic or hypoplastic blue irides, white forelock or early graying of scalp hair (<30 years), and a suggestive family history. Diagnosis is primarily clinical, supported by audiological evaluation and, when possible, molecular genetic testing. There is no curative treatment; early supportive interventions, particularly hearing rehabilitation, are essential. With timely management, most patients maintain normal life expectancy and developmental potential. Given the syndrome’s rarity and the distinctive clinical features, we present this case to highlight key diagnostic signs and facilitate recognition in other patients. Case presentation Summary: A 13-year-old male, originally from Canada and residing in Portugal for the past two years, was referred to the Pediatric Endocrinology consultation for evaluation of short stature (height 141.6cm, 1st percentile, -2.13 SDS; weight 39.9 kg; 25st percentile, -0.72 SDS). His gestation was uneventful, and his early developmental milestones were reported to be within normal limits. He is currently integrated into the Portuguese school system and benefits from individualized educational support. The patient has a personal history of congenital sensorineural hearing loss and has been using hearing aids since 14 months of age, which have allowed him to develop functional communication skills. On physical examination, several striking phenotypic features were observed. These included a frontal white forelock, intensely blue irises, and evident distopia canthorum. No family history of similar physical features was reported by the parents. Endocrine evaluation revealed normal growth hormone function, and the patient was in the early stages of puberty, consistent with his chronological age. Given the presence of these unusual phenotypic characteristics, he was referred for comprehensive genetic evaluation. Genetic testing ultimately identified a mutation in the PAX3 gene, confirming the diagnosis of Waardenburg syndrome type I. Subsequent testing of both parents demonstrated that the mutation had arisen de novo, with neither parent carrying the same genetic alteration. Learning Points Discussion: Waardenburg syndrome is a rare genetic disorder with distinctive phenotypic features, including congenital sensorineural hearing loss, pigmentary abnormalities, and characteristic hair and ocular changes. Recognizing this typical phenotypic presentation is essential, as early identification allows timely audiological intervention, which can significantly improve developmental outcomes and quality of life. This case, supported by a clinical photograph illustrating the classic phenotype, highlights the importance of careful examination and clinical suspicion in diagnosing affected individuals, facilitating prompt management and genetic counseling for families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExcellence in Pediatrics AbstractsSame topicmelanin and skin pigmentationFrench-language works237,207