MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7152739110 · doi:10.71446/bh47392741

Our Starting Place

2025· book-chapter· W7152739110 on OpenAlexaff
Elder Albert Marshall

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousRacismCultural safetyPoliticsAction (physics)Health careIndigenous educationSpace (punctuation)Action research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this chapter, Melissa and Sandra provide an overview of the book, Decolonizing health, healing and care: Embodying culturally responsive and socially just counselling. They highlight the book’s uniqueness, from both content and process perspectives. The decolonial approach to health, healing, and care amplifies Indigenous ways of knowing, being, and doing, including pedagogies (ways of teaching and learning). The authors open up the space for multiple perspectives on health, healing, and care by proposing an approach to the practice of counselling and psychology that (a) responds to the TRC’s (2015a) Calls to Action; (b) is client-centred and culturally responsive; (c) amplifies the strengths of each person’s or community’s ways of knowing, doing, and being; (d) engages counsellors and other healthcare practitioners in recognizing and remediating the harms arising from social, economic, and political inequities and injustices; and (e) fosters collective action toward health, healing, and socially just care. Melissa and Sandra challenge the colonial influences embedded within counselling and psychology, noting that unpacking anti-Indigenous and other forms of racism also invites examination of sexism, heterosexism, ableism, classism, and other oppressive ideologies. They re-vision health, healing, and care by centring Indigenous ways of knowing, being, and doing in counselling and psychology. The design of the book itself amplifies Indigenous teaching and learning practices by welcoming Indigenous Wisdom, honouring stories, embracing co-learning and reciprocity, fostering wholeness and relationality, welcoming repetition and interactive learning, and integrating oral, visual, and multimedia learning. They then overview the eight CRSJ counselling pathways, which form a foundation for the book, aligning them within the four directions of the nêhiyaw (Cree) Medicine Wheel. Melissa and Sandra are deeply honoured that Elder Dr Albert Marshall (of the Moose Clan, Mi'kmaw Nation from Eskasoni in Unama'ki, Cape Breton, Nova Scotia) has provided an opening offering by video in this chapter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.463
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.008
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4630.273

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→