Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rock rooster.On November 3, a boy shot one near the Rifle Range which had just put itself on the outside of a Ruffed Grouse.Mr. E. G. White noticed two large ones, and shot them, near Pembroke, in the next county; one was in the act of devouring a grouse.The taxidermist got some more to mount, all in the finest blue plumage, save one which I saw in the market, which was in the immature plumage.Mr. E. Beaupr of Kingston writes me, that he never saw so many Goshawks together as this year.There were regular flights of them passing over the city.He saw them almost every day in October, but during the first week in November they were most abundant.He saw seven flying at one time.One he approached quite close while on a stump tearing a Hairy Woodpecker.Another tried to make a meal of a wooden decoy duck.Many were brought to the local taxidermists.The Pine Grosbeak (Pinicola enucleator leucurus) was also unusually early this year.The first ones were seen November 3 near the Rifle Range; one was found dead on the Experimental Farm, November 5.At the same time Mr. E.G. White reported them as extremely common near Pembroke, Renfrew County.And from then till now, they have stayed here.At first they were more common on the outskirts of the city, in smnac patches, but now they have invaded the city, as they did three years ago, only then they came somewhat later.They stay and feed on the many mountain ash trees in the city.The Snowy Owl (Nyctea nyctea) seems again to have given Ottawa a wide berth, whereas further south many are reported.I have seen only one thus far, which was shot about November 5 up the Gatineau valley, about 30 miles north.Mr. E. G. White reports another one having been seen near Pembroke.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".