MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7153679129

Songs of Field and Savannah Sparrows

2024· article· W7153679129 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
The Auk

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSparrowField (mathematics)Field strength
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Songs of Field and Savannah Sparrows.Editor of 'The Auk': Mr. Mousley ('Auk,' xliv, 1927, p. 523) includes the Field Sparrow (Sp/zella pusilla pusilla) in his list of the birds of Harley, Quebec, on the strength of a list of species observed at Sherbrooke by Mr. R. G. Price, printed in 'The Ottawa Naturalist,' XXIV, 1910, 55-57, supplemented by a letter from Mr. Price.In a locality where the Indigo Bunting is found one need not be surprised to find the Field Sparrow also, but a careful consideration of the evidence given of its actual occurrence in the Harley-Sherbrooke region is not convincing.Mr. Price's rendering of the song of his 'Field Sparrows' as "sit-sit-sit and s-i-n-g f-r-e-e," resembling as it does so closely Dr. Dwight's tsip-tsip-tsip • s•'-•-•-s'r-r-r in Chapman's Handbook, strikes me as a particularly happy rendering of the Savannah Sparrow's song, while I cannot see in it the slightest suggestion of the Field Sparrow's.It is significant, too, that Mr. Price says that the song "is usually delivered from the top of a fence post or some low obiect"-very characteristic of the Savannah Sparrow but not of the Field Sparrow, which usually chooses a higher perch.Still more significant is the fact that though the Savannah Sparrow is "fairly common" at Harley, it is entirely omitted from Mr. Price's Sherbrooke list.Of course the Savannah Sparrow is much more a field Sparrow than Spizella pusilla, and it is not surprising that Mr. Price, who includes the "Jenny Wren" in his list, should know it by that name.Even so good an observer as Thoreau was deceived by a mere name when he called the Pileated Woodpecker of the Maine woods the Red-headed Woodpecker, adding the scientific name Picus erythrocephalus.Mr. Mousley may not be the first author to accept Mr. Price's 'Field Sparrows' at their face value, and, as it is always hard to overtake a false record, he may not be the last; so that we can only hope that he will himself soon find an undoubted Field Sparrow at Harley and thus establish the presence there of a species that pretty surely does not as yet deserve a place in his list.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)Same topicAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207