MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7153685380

Genetic and Phenotypic Differentiation in a Wood Warbler (genus Dendroica) Hybrid Zone

2024· article· W7153685380 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
George F. Barrowclough

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCline (biology)Hybrid zoneAllopatric speciationSubspeciesMicroevolutionGenetic variationMacroevolutionPhenotypic traitGenetic drift
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrophoresis and mathematical models of clines were used to investigate the extent of genetic differentiation and the magnitudes of the evolutionary forces acting in a Dendroica c. coronata-D.c. auduboni (Aves: Parulidae) hybrid zone in the Canadian Rocky Mountains.Estimates of the genetic distance between the two taxa are comparable to the degree of genetic differentiation found among subspecies of other passerines.The normalized among-population component of genetic variance, as measured by F.•, is of the order of 0.01.This is similar to that found among populations of other species of birds.Thus, there is no evidence for extensive genetic differentiation or a "genetic revolution" between these two forms at the structural gene level.It is difficult to discriminate among alternative models for the origin of the phenotypic differences between the two taxa, but an allopatric origin in geographically isolated refugia during the Pleistocene is the most parsimonious interpretation of the available data.Secondary contact probably occurred approximately 7,500 yr ago.An investigation of the evolutionary forces responsible for the phenotypic differences between the two taxa suggests that the current width of the hybrid zone is completely consistent with a dynamic cline involving the diffusion of neutral alleles.If, instead, the cline is currently in gene flow-selection equilibrium, then the magnitude of selection against the traits of one morph in the range of the other may only be of the order of 10 4. In the absence of knowledge about the degree of dominance of alleles coding for the variable phenotypic characters, however, discrimination among alternative cline models is difficult.In any case, it is not necessary to invoke the existence of strong selective forces to explain the cline through this hybrid zone.Any selection for positive assortative mating would not be deterministic; hence, these taxa should be treated as subspecies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)→Same topicGenetic diversity and population structure→French-language works237,207→