Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kirke Swann's 'Synoptical List of the Accipitres.'•--PartIV of this work brings it to a conclusion and from the preface which accompanies it we learn that it is largely based upon the late Dr. Bowdler-Sharpe's 'Catalogue of the Accipitres in the British Museum,' the author's annotated copy with his additions having been accessible to Mr. Swann; and also upon Mr. W. L. Sclater's manuscript list of the specimens in the Museum.While the author uses subspecies extensively he does not seem to recognize intergradation as the criterion upon which they must be distinguished from species since he recognizes three 'species • of our American Sparrow Hawks, all of which are usually regarded as subspecies of sparverius.He also considers that the dark Gyrfalcons which visit Canada in winter as young of F. rusticolus candicans rather than true rust•colus.While Mr. Swann's little work summarizes our present systematic knowledge of the Accipitres it seems to indicate that much has still to be accomplished before we are prepared to satisfactorily monograph the group.--W.S. Bibliography of British Ornithology.2--Thethird part of the 'Biographical Bibliography of British Ornithology' by Messrs. Mullens, Swarm and Jourdain contains the contributions to county ornithology from Middlesex to Surry.One will gain some idea of the extent of the literature relating to the birds of the English counties when he finds that for Norfolk alone the authors have listed 600 titles, while the number of additions each year is constantly increasing.Few of our states can show such a bibliography while many of our counties are without any ornithological notes whatever.This work serves as an excellent illustration of the extent of intensive study of birds in Great Britian and the vast number of persons who are interested and capable of publishing local notes of value.Part four completes England and begins Wales.--W.S. Brook's 'The Buzzard at Home.'•--This little brochure is entitled "British Birds Photographic Series" and is apparently the first of the series.It consists of twelve excellent half-tone reproductions of photographs of the European Buzzard, its nest and young, with fourteen pages • A Synoptical List Of the Accipitres (Diurnal Birds O! Prey).Part IV.Falconidae and Pandiones.By It.I•irke Swan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.261 | 0.113 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".