Death Ritual Practices Among the Dangaura Tharu of Nepal
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the death ritual practices of the Dangaura Tharu community in Nepal, focusing on how these rituals embody cultural beliefs, social values, and community solidarity. It aims to explore the spiritual, social, and symbolic meanings of death rites such as body washing and wrapping, the use of khatiya (bamboo bed), lighting the diyo (lamp), offering rice, and performing purification rituals (kriya). Conducted in the Kailali and Bardiya districts through qualitative ethnographic methods, the research engaged 25 participants, including ritual specialists (guruwa, kesauka), elders, and bereaved families. Data were gathered through participant observation, interviews, and group discussions. The study draws on Durkheim’s theory of social cohesion, Blumer’s symbolic interactionism, and Goffman’s theory of ritual interaction to interpret how collective mourning and symbolic acts reaffirm unity, moral order, and social continuity. Findings reveal that each ritual act from carrying the body to observing food restrictions and performing kriya carries profound social and spiritual significance, reinforcing kinship, gender, and generational roles within the Tharu community. In spite of modern challenges such as migration and state health interventions, these rituals demonstrate the Tharu’s cultural determination and continuing respect for ancestors. The study is significant for understanding how traditional rituals mediate between individual emotion and collective identity, transforming grief into social renewal, and serves as a valuable foundation for future researchers interested in the connection of ritual, belief, and social cohesion in indigenous communities of Nepal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it