Bibliographic record
Abstract
Métis Grandmother, healer, heARTist, activist, and educator Fyre Jean Graveline invites readers to join her in Journeying Together aRound Sacred Medicine Wheel. It is a Journey to Revitalize Lived, In.tuitive, and Embodied Knowings; to ReAwaken Indigenous Ancestral cultural and spiritual belief systems; to embrace healthy Forms of Relationality based on matrilineal collective egalitarian power sharing; and to individually and collectively creatively reWeave our shared web of Ecological Sustainability, our Oneness. When unlearning colonial attitudes and learning Indigenous Ways of Knowing, seeing, being, and doing, We may be challenged and changed through what We are encountering. We can continuously Ground with.in Medicine Wheel and seek to reBalance by Connecting to our Senses, to Elemental Powers. Fyre Jean introduces the concept of HeARTivism to describe active engagement in creative change processes: We can make visible, give form, sound, movement, voice, words, to what We and our Relations have lived through, in ways that emPower us to Name and TransForm Dominant and Still Dominating People, Systems and Structures. Breathing and Earthing are introduced as practices to support us as We Journey to Find Balance in our UnBalanced World, to reVeal and TransForm our shared WorldEcology. This is the first of five chapters that walk readers around the Medicine Wheel: East Door, South Door, West Door, North Door.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".