MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7154448628 · doi:10.17348/jbrit.v19.i4.1439

Evolution and taxonomic revision of the “residual highbush” blueberries of Vaccinium sect. Cyanococcus (Ericaceae)

2025· article· W7154448628 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Peter W. Fritsch, Andrew A. Crowl, Paul Manos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBerry genetics and cultivation research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEurostarsCentre in Green Chemistry and CatalysisNERC Environmental Bioinformatics CentreUniversity of PittsburghSyracuse UniversityHawk Mountain Sanctuary AssociationUniversity of PennsylvaniaRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteCommonwealth Health Research BoardGeorge Mason University
KeywordsMonophylyPolyploidVacciniumTaxonomy (biology)PloidyClade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The taxonomy of naturally occurring Vaccinium corymbosum has varied widely. The original monograph of V. sect. Cyanococcus treated the species narrowly as a tetraploid of the northeastern U.S. and adjacent Canada, whereas the most recent treatment of the section synonymized many species under a single polymorphic species ranging across eastern North America. Data from morphology, phylogenomics, and flow cytometry to assess ploidy have recently been used to resurrect several of the original species from the synonymy of V. corymbosum. This has left remaining a “residual highbush” blueberry group of uncertain species number and delimitation. We assessed the taxonomy of this group in the context of its origin and evolution with the same types of data and analyses used to segregate the prior species. Phylogenomic analysis yielded a monophyletic residual highbush group corroborated by several morphological characters. Neither the diploids nor the tetraploids in the clade formed monophyletic groups, but principal component and genetic structure analyses provided evidence of mostly distinct groups aligned with ploidy. The two ploidal levels have largely nonoverlapping geographic ranges, with the diploids in the southeastern U.S. and tetraploids in the northeastern U.S. and adjacent Canada, overlapping along the Atlantic Coastal Plain and East Gulf Coastal Plain. The nonmonophyly of the tetraploids, together with the prior finding of high frequencies of unreduced gametes in the residual highbush clade, suggest multiple autopolyploid origins. The lack of tetraploids throughout the entire western range of the diploids suggests that polyploid formation is localized or rare and that the two ploidy levels have largely followed separate evolutionary trajectories. We found higher genetic diversity in the tetraploid versus the diploid, suggesting that if gene flow is occurring between ploidal levels, it is not recent. Based on a synthesis of the data, we recognize two species, the diploid V. fuscatum and the tetraploid V. corymbosum, differentiated at least in part morphologically by characters that may be associated with the polyploid gigas effect. We provide a taxonomic revision, including a key, full synonymy, a discussion of character variation, nomenclatural and ecological notes, geographic distribution maps, and lists of representative specimens examined. We place four names variably recognized in recent floristic and horticultural literature in synonymy, i.e., the diploids V. atrococcum and V. caesariense under V. fuscatum, and the tetraploids V. formosum and V. marianum under V. corymbosum. We provide lectotypes for Cyanococcus holophyllus, V. atlanticum, V. caesariense, V. corymbosum, V. corymbosum var. atrocarpum, V. corymbosum var. glabrum, V. formosum, V. fuscatum, V. marianum, and V. vicinum. Vaccinium cuthbertii is placed under the synonym of V. fuscatum but warrants further investigation as to its possible taxonomic distinctness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.838

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Botanical Research Institute of TexasSame topicBerry genetics and cultivation researchFrench-language works237,207