MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7154570630 · doi:10.5284/1140898

Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment of Garden Street and Broad Lane, Sheffield, South Yorkshire

2007· article· en· W7154570630 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Stenton

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoric siteAllotmentIndustrial areaQuarter (Canadian coin)Town councilArtifact (error)Town centre

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In July 2007, ARCUS were commissioned by Merlin Estates to undertake a desk-based assessment of land at Garden Street and Broad Lane, Sheffield, South Yorkshire (SK 34935 87524). The plot comprises the premises of Imprints at 23 Garden Street and the Sheffield Window Centre at 60-70 Broad Lane. The assessment included a site visit, along with documentary and cartographic research. The desk-based assessment indicates that in 1637, the proposal area was located immediately north of Broad Lane, a route which may have developed as a droveway during the medieval period, when the site itself is likely to have been part of the commons of Sheffields Town Field. There is no evidence relating directly to the proposal area prior to 1736, when it was undeveloped land. However, by 1779 the site contained a number of allotment gardens with associated small sheds. The proposal area had been developed by 1808, although individual structures were not shown until 1853 when the site was occupied by terraced and back-to-back housing. In addition to these domestic properties, retail and small industrial premises were also present within the site by 1876. The 19th-century structures were demolished in 1935 during municipal clearance programmes and were replaced by the present- day buildings. These were constructed in 1935 by John Cooper and Sons Ltd as a single press tool works. Coopers ceased trading in 1976, with the building being sub- divided subsequently into separate Garden Street and Broad Lane premises. It is not clear if the 19th-century buildings contained cellarage, and the extent to which the construction of the 1935 works may have impacted upon any sub-surface deposits relating to the earlier structures is also unknown. If the workshop area of 23 Garden Street was levelled during the sites 20th-century redevelopment this would have destroyed any archaeological deposits that may have been present in this area. Much of the interior of 60-70 Broad Lane may have been landscaped to create a level platform during its 1935 construction. Should that be the case, this may have preserved 19th-century archaeological deposits beneath the present-day floor level. However, it is also possible that basement levels are present in this area. In that case, their construction is likely to have damaged sub-surface deposits associated with the sites 19th-century buildings. This cannot be determined on the basis of the current evidence. Should the decision be taken to demolish the extant structures, further evaluation may be required in order to assess the extent of survival of sub-surface archaeological features and deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207