MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7154692674 · doi:10.71446/sd86862525

3.0 Pathway 3 Fostering Cultural Safety

2025· book-chapter· W7154692674 on OpenAlexaff
Melissa Jay, Sandra Collins, Jessie King, Amy Rubin, Nubia Chong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Competency in Health Care
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultural humilityCultural safetyDistrustOppressionHealth careEthnocentrismCultural competenceIdentity (music)Honour

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Culture is inseparable from health, healing, and care. It permeates every aspect of the counselling process. Pathway 3 focuses on fostering cultural safety by providing pathways for health and healing that honour and centre cultural diversity. The authors move away from attempting to guarantee safety to fostering safer or safe enough spaces for collaborative therapeutic work, recognizing the uniqueness of each individual and the impossibility of fully predicting what safety means for each person. This includes acknowledging the trauma and understandable distrust many clients carry with them as a result of their histories of systemic and cultural oppression within healthcare settings. Melissa, Sandra, and Jessie consider carefully how intersecting cultural identities, beliefs, and attitudes of both practitioners and clients shape health and healing relationships, cautioning against unintentional othering that may arise from ethnocentric and eurocentric practices. Co-creating a sense of cultural safety with clients is a powerful way to reduce the impact of health-limiting social determinants, which often lead to healthcare inequities. This pathway supports intentional attunement to clients’ needs as a relational foundation for cultural safety and therapeutic work through three key practices introduced in the chapters that follow: cultural humility, ethical space, and respect for dignity. The authors underscore that the ultimate determination of safety and trust in therapeutic relationships lies with the clients themselves. Melissa, Sandra, and Jessie are grateful for the offerings of these co-authors: ● Amy Rubin shares their insights into the nuanced ways in which cultural identity and belonging shape our experiences and sense of safety from their positioning as a white, queer, Ashkenazi Jewish settler. ● Nubia Chong offers grounding statements to help practitioners and activists stay present in their bodies as they weather the collective trauma of the crisis in Palestine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0030.016
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0960.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCultural Competency in Health CareFrench-language works237,207