Metalowe okucie kalety/torebki typu litewskiego z Zagórzyc, st. 3, pow. Kazimierza Wielka, woj. świętokrzyskie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bartłomiej Szymon Szmoniewski, Jacek Pikulski, Marek Trojan, 2025, Metalowe okucie kalety/torebki typu litewskiego z Zagórzyc, st. 3, pow. Kazimierza Wielka, woj. świętokrzyskie, Archeologiczne Zeszyty Sprawozdawcze 4/2025, 93-97. Przedmiotem niniejszego komunikatu jest okucie odlewane ze stopu miedzi,odkryte podczas badań archeologicznych na stanowisku 3 w Zagórzycach,gm. Kazimierza Wielka, woj. świętokrzyskie. Zabytek ten można zaklasyfikowaćjako okucie centralne kalety/torebki typu litewskiego, typ V, odmiana II wedługklasyfikacji E. Svetikasa (2003) oraz typ A–B według typologii J. Sawickiegoi P. Karpińskiego (2017). Chronologia analogicznych znalezisk z obszaru Litwyjest odnoszona na okres od ostatniej ćw. XVI w. do 1. poł. XVII w. (Svetikas 2003). The subject of this report is a cast fitting made of a copper alloy, discoveredduring archaeological research at site 3 in Zagórzyce, Kazimierza Wielka commune,Świętokrzyskie province. The artifact can be classified as a central fittingof a Lithuanian-type pouch/bag, type V, variant II according to the classificationby E. Svetikas (2003), and type A–B according to the typology by J. Sawickiand P. Karpiński (2017). The chronology of analogous finds from the territory ofLithuania is dated from the last quarter of the 16th century to the first half of the17th century (Svetikas 2003).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".