MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7155394668 · doi:10.3917/etr.0853.0417c

Irmtraud F ischer , Des femmes aux prises avec Dieu. Récits bibliques sur les débuts d’Israël , trad. Charles E hlinger , Paris/Montréal, Cerf/Mediaspaul, coll. « Lire la Bible 152 », 2008. 21,5 cm. 239 p. ISBN 978-2-204-08565-6/978-2-89420-739-0. € 32. Irmtraud F ischer , Des femmes messagères de Dieu. Le phénomène de la prophétie et des prophétesses dans la Bible hébraïque. Pour une interprétation respectueuse de la dualité sexuelle , trad. Charles E hlinger , Paris/Montréal, Cerf/Médiaspaul, coll. « Lire la Bible 153 », 2009. 21,5 cm. 404 p. ISBN 978-2-204-08664-6/978-2-89420-763-5. € 42

2010· article· fr· W7155394668 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Waltraud Verlaguet

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes théologiques et religieuses · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDerogationContext (archaeology)Subject (documents)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’exposé d’Élian C uvillier* analyse la tension, repérable dans quelques passages du premier Évangile, entre l’obéissance aux commandements se situant à l’intérieur du cadre donné par la Loi, et la radicalisation à laquelle invite le Jésus matthéen. L’enquête débute par une exégèse détaillée de Mt 5, 17-20, puis s’intéresse à trois épisodes où la tension entre obéissance et radicalisation est apparente : les antithèses du Sermon sur la montagne (5, 17-48), la controverse sur le divorce (19, 1-9), l’épisode du jeune homme riche (19, 16-22). Dans une troisième partie, l’auteur s’interroge sur la cohérence des passages analysés avec la déclaration de Jésus en Mt 23, 2-3. La conclusion propose quelques réflexions sur le rapport de Matthieu avec le judaïsme de son temps1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.011
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes théologiques et religieusesSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207