MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7155394668 · doi:10.3917/etr.0853.0417c

Irmtraud F ischer , Des femmes aux prises avec Dieu. Récits bibliques sur les débuts d’Israël , trad. Charles E hlinger , Paris/Montréal, Cerf/Mediaspaul, coll. « Lire la Bible 152 », 2008. 21,5 cm. 239 p. ISBN 978-2-204-08565-6/978-2-89420-739-0. € 32. Irmtraud F ischer , Des femmes messagères de Dieu. Le phénomène de la prophétie et des prophétesses dans la Bible hébraïque. Pour une interprétation respectueuse de la dualité sexuelle , trad. Charles E hlinger , Paris/Montréal, Cerf/Médiaspaul, coll. « Lire la Bible 153 », 2009. 21,5 cm. 404 p. ISBN 978-2-204-08664-6/978-2-89420-763-5. € 42

2010· article· fr· W7155394668 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Waltraud Verlaguet

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes théologiques et religieuses · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDerogationContext (archaeology)Subject (documents)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’exposé d’Élian C uvillier* analyse la tension, repérable dans quelques passages du premier Évangile, entre l’obéissance aux commandements se situant à l’intérieur du cadre donné par la Loi, et la radicalisation à laquelle invite le Jésus matthéen. L’enquête débute par une exégèse détaillée de Mt 5, 17-20, puis s’intéresse à trois épisodes où la tension entre obéissance et radicalisation est apparente : les antithèses du Sermon sur la montagne (5, 17-48), la controverse sur le divorce (19, 1-9), l’épisode du jeune homme riche (19, 16-22). Dans une troisième partie, l’auteur s’interroge sur la cohérence des passages analysés avec la déclaration de Jésus en Mt 23, 2-3. La conclusion propose quelques réflexions sur le rapport de Matthieu avec le judaïsme de son temps1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes théologiques et religieusesSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207